There are days I feel exactly like Jack Polo, the
protagonist of this piece. We’ve all had those days where nothing goes right:
the key doesn’t work, the blinds won’t close properly, the cat explodes all
over the living room. After reading Clive Barker’s short story, I can now
imagine the worse every time I lock myself out of a hotel room. But is it really the worse, or did he give me
the ability to see things are sometimes just out of my control?
The story is about a minor demon called Yattering who is sent
to harass the mild-mannered son of a woman who reneged on a contract with
Beelzebub. That contract, for whatever reason, was to result in the woman’s
soul being turned over to Hell. Instead, she confessed her sins at death and
ascended to Heaven. Jack is to be payment for this broken contract. To get his
soul, the minor demon must cause him to go crazy.
I’m now convinced my ex-wife is a Yattering.
But Jack is privy to the plan and never allows himself to
lose his temper or allow his thoughts to settle too long on the fact he’s being
pursued. In fact, he has a plan to win the day.
Barker is known for his dark works of fiction, including The Hellbound Heart mentioned in an
earlier blog post, as well as Imajica and
The Great and Secret Show. But The Yattering and Jack is one of his
rare jaunts into lighter, more comedic fare.
Where the book stumbles the most is the almost blasé way in
which Barker reveals that Jack is in on the secret. The first third of the
story is told from the POV of the demon, and so much times passes that I stop
suspecting I might get it from Polo’s point of view. Then suddenly I get
insight into Polo in an abrupt, head-hopping transitional paragraph. I say
abrupt because Barker’s style is so fluid that anything can happen at any
moment, and the reader needs to be prepared. Reading Barker is an act of
conscientious reading, in which the text should be studied. He is not a lazy
Saturday evening read.
There’s nothing spectacular about this story, though it was
featured as an episode of Tales from the
Darkside. Because we spend so much time with the Yattering at the
beginning, it’s hard to see any kind of character arc from our protagonist. We
have to assume that he’s been playing the game a long time, and he finally gets
a chance at a final showdown. The biggest arc is for the antagonist, who, in a
fit of rage, goes a little mad and makes a couple of clumsy mistakes the way
he’d hoped Jack would.
The ending was only mildly satisfying, and leaves open the
possibility that perhaps Jack didn’t win. Looking back, the reader may wonder
if all the events had been foreseen by the Yattering’s masters and they got
exactly what they wanted. It’s a classic case of short-story comeuppance that
can be satisfying and infuriating in equal measure.
Clive Barker was a force in the 80s, and has given us plenty
of classics. But I can’t shake the feeling that this is just an adaptation of
some folktale or fairy tale he’d heard as a kid.
I feel like it's a modernization of The Reluctant Familiar by Nikolaus Stuart Gray, who's another British writer who wrote for children. In Reluctant, a wizard summons a demon and the demon plays a lot of silly tricks on the guy, but it's from the demon's point of view. The tone of that demon and the Yattering were so close I'm almost certain the one is in conversation with the other.
ReplyDeleteOf course, Barker's not writing for kids so you get all the great Hell stuff and exploding cats.
I'm glad somebody else saw the comparisons with the every-day person and the way things go wrong. Here I thought my interpretation was just craziness.
ReplyDeleteSee, I completely missed the reveal twice. I just had a hunch in the back of mind he may have knew. When the stuff started up with him and his daughters getting terrorized, I kinda just let my brain go out the window and read whatever was coming at me.
Yet, in an odd way. Even though we get the majority from the Yattering's perspective...I somehow felt like I was in the head of Polo the entire time as well. It's hard to explain why, but I just did.
I too found it comedic, even went so far as to state that I thought The Yattering and Jack could be another "First Horror Novel" for children. I got some flack for that, but I stand by my comment. I think anytime you can sit and chuckle, and the book doesn't incite fear, you have a book for the young.
ReplyDeleteI still have yet to read something from Barker that impressed me. I now everyone talks about him being a master of the craft, so perhaps i just need to sit and read through the Books of Blood.