Everybody groaned. I could hear them, spread about the
continental United States like Cold War sleeper agents. But instead of spies,
they were students. Students of popular fiction. Of writing popular fiction. Of
looking at what makes a book marketable and engaging (the two aren’t
necessarily intertwined, as one would hope). The assignments had been handed
out. The dice were cast.
One such die landed on Sarah Pinborough’s Breeding Ground. A book about giant
spiders. The premise alone was enough to draw out moans boredom and squeals of
self-righteous indignation. I read the one-line quips on Facebook: “The
shittiest book ever,” “It’s hard to find because it’s so awful,” “It was a hard
one for me to get through.”
I added my own voice to the chorus after only a few pages,
even so much as to decry why such a folly had been wrought against us by our
class professor. I even debated throwing the book into a campfire just to take
pictures and post about how awful it was and how awesome I was.
In the end, I abandoned my Fahrenheit 451 daydreams. And then it happened. I set aside my self-pity
and engaged myself in the book. I surrendered
to it.
It wasn’t terrible.
In the beginning, I hated the way Pinborough writes. But you
know what? The “mistakes” I saw in her were mistakes I myself have been
corrected on. Participial phrases, semicolons, poor characterization. I began
to see myself in Pinborough, and draw parallels to my own writing. She’s a
woman writing about a man. I’m a man writing a woman. She writes men horribly.
I write women… subpar.
There’s nothing fantastic in this book. There are no
earth-shattering insights or amazing characters. In fact, I’d argue the
characters end the book as two-dimensional as they begin. None of them are
extremely likeable, especially the protagonist. We’re introduced to this man
who loves loves loves his wife. She’s
the center of his universe, the light of his life, the apple in his eyes.
Within a week after his wife turns into a giant spider, he’s
sleeping with a random woman who survived the arachnid apocalypse. And by the
end, he’s running off with another rare woman.
No, I am not a fan of Matthew Edge.
I’m not really a fan of any of the characters in the book.
They’re whiny or mean or paper thin. They are not characters that I, as a
writer, would ever want to create. They were just there, created to provide
eyes though which to tell a story. Near the end of the book, when there’s talk
of other pockets of survivors, I so desperately wished the book had been
written from any of their points of view.
Pinborough’s apocalypse unwinds too quickly. Not the spiders
themselves, but the characters. They abandon hope too quickly and ride away
from their nice, safe house the first day. They put themselves in danger for no
solid reason except to move the story forward. It wasn’t natural, and it felt
forced. As a reader, I don’t want to be forced to believe or feel something, I
just want to experience it and let those emotions come naturally. As a writer,
I want to do the same thing.
So why did I end up enjoying it?
It wasn’t pretentious. I didn’t have a grand message (except
maybe don’t mess GMOs, but I think even that was a false belief held by the
sole scientist in the story). I didn’t feel like what I was reading took any
effort. It was, in short, a summer read. It took me nearly a month to read. In
the meantime, I wrote a lot, read some other things, and just went about my
life. But each time I picked it up, it was where I left off. I didn’t need to
go back, or put myself in a “mood” to read it. It was simple.
The book’s cover has the following inscription: “Fans of
Bentley Little, Richard Laymon and Dean Koontz will be pleased.”
The joke? That’s for an entirely different book! I’m a huge
fan of Little and Laymon (my bookshelf will corroborate that), and I enjoy a
little Koontz as much as the next person, but I saw no similarities to them in Breeding Ground. There was none of
Koontz’s amazing characterization. None of Laymon’s animalistic over-sexualization
(okay, there was one passage…) and I turned the book upside down and sideways
and couldn’t find any of Little’s hyper-reality.
No, friends, Breeding
Ground is not a great book. It’s barely a mediocre one. But, it’s a quick,
unassuming read with a fun monster (the ones at the end are even worse!), that
taught me a thing or two about myself and my writing.
There’s a sequel, but I don’t think I’ll pick it up. I’d hate
to lose any more respect for somebody who has been lauded of late for her
brilliant writing.
It's interesting that the lack of some deep meaning made this an ok read for you. That killed it for me. Well, that and all the gaping plot holes and shallow characterization. I guess it depends on what you read a book for. If you grab a book for a mellow distraction, like waiting for a plane or something, I guess I could see not taking issue with this novel. It probably wasn't meant to be taken as a deep insightful story, but rather an easy read. Maybe if I had just let go of my expectations, I would have tolerated it better. Still, it bothers me when a book has no point. A storyteller should make their tale entertaining but should also reveal something about life/humanity/society/ect., so that the tale is worth my time. Or I might just be a tad snobby (quite possible).
ReplyDeleteThe sexism was grading as well. Pinborough was obviously uncomfortable writing from a male perspective. Matt Edge felt like a mashup of generic male stereotypes and assumptions women make about men. The gender of a character does need to be taken into consideration as the world treats genders differently and thereby may cause personality traits to development because of that. However, we are all human. Overall, men and women are more similar than dissimilar. Pinborogh didn't give Matt a sense of any sort of real humanity.
On a side note, your female characters are better than Pinborough's males. It almost felt as if she didn't really try to flesh out any of her characters. I have every faith you will polish your female characters and make them fully formed people.
Vanessa, I found Matthew Edge to be about the most deplorable antagonist I've ever read... and I read a lot of Richard Laymon. And you're right, so many male stereotypes.
ReplyDeleteI don't need any over-arching themes about humanity, but I do need good, believable characters. Part of me thinks I ended up somewhat enjoying it because I like to be a contrarian (is that a word? I thought it was, but it's not in the dictionary). Flat characters and woefully unbelievable motivators aside, I really just enjoyed it because it didn't make me work. If I had an e-book version of it, I probably would've finished it faster because it's just as easy to read waiting in line at the grocery store for three minutes as it is to sit down in a chair with it for two hours.
Thanks for what you said about my female characters. I try to write them as people first, women second.
I agree with a lot of what you said. I like that you called it a summer read. It went down quick and easy like a cheap but decent beer. You can like a book and hate the characters, so what you said about Matt is on point.
ReplyDeleteI know I use my background a lot in my bashing of these books so I am looking forward to your take on WWZ. That being said, aside from the crap science, this was a good quick read. The kind of book I would have picked up at the drug store as a young adolescent and begged my mom to let me read because it was a "scary book". And I probably would have loved it as a kid. So yeah, I didn't hate it either. It was just "meh"
Joe-la
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI certainly agree with you, Chad. Edge didn't strike me as a well developed character, nor were any of the others. Though the book did have an interesting premise, she didn't take it far enough. And I certainly don't think she's on a Laymon level. I've read "The Beast House" and that scared the living hell out of me for good reason: the characters would react in similar fashion to myself.
ReplyDeleteIf I lived in a world where the men were as boring as Matt Edge, Nigel Phelps, and George whatever I would want to turn into a giant spider and eat them all.
ReplyDeleteShe's not a terrible writer (judging by other books), but this is a terrible book. Weak premise, poorly executed characters. The best part was watching them die. I will be burning my copy. I won't have my children finding this some day and judging me for my poor taste in literature.
Harsh, but understandable :)
DeleteI wonder if I am going to find anyone who enjoyed the book. I think it goes back to what I said in my post on when humor is just plain dumb. I stated that I can enjoy a horror film until it becomes unbelievable. Now granted a lot of horror is made up, but the plot in most cases is enjoyable when well written. In this case, that just didn't happen.
ReplyDeleteAs for moving on to the sequel, hell no! There's too many other books on the list that I'm excited to move on to, and during the break, its my time to read books on my list.