I don’t know what I’m supposed to do with this blog. Do I
write about the writing prowess of LA prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi (with a
little help from Curt Gentry), or do I focus on the psychotic nature of its subject?
I’m going to go with…
The Manson Family, a cult of hippies in the late 1960s. Everybody
knows the story: In the summer of 1969, members of the Family murdered seven
people over two nights in what is now referred to as the Tate-LaBianca murders.
Everybody involved with Manson at the time was damaged. That’s my official
diagnosis. From Susan Atkins, Leslie Van Houten, Patricia Krenwinkel, Mary
Brunner, and Charles Watson to the rest living with Manson on his roaming
communes, each one was searching for something. It might have been acceptance,
love, or themselves. Whatever they were looking for, they found it with
somebody possibly more damaged than themselves.
Charles Manson’s childhood, when taken by itself, is
heartbreaking. An absent father, a mother more interested in men than her
little boy, bouncing in and out of institutions. He makes a compelling case for
the nature vs. nurture debate, and one must wonder if he would have been so
desperate for acceptance if he’d had a different upbringing. As a writer, the
Manson character makes for a good template to create a character from.
His behavior during the trial wavers on outlandish, and if
I’d seen it in a book I’d probably feel it was forced by the writer. But,
seeing that a real psychopath can unhinge and react like that under pressure
should alleviate the concerns of many writers feeling they’ve written a
character that acts out of character from time to time. We don’t see how Manson
acted 100 percent of the time while with his Family, so we don’t know if this
is just a one-time response to the trial, or a recurring trait. If this were
fiction, I’d like to have seen a glimpse of that side of him at some point earlier
in the story. It’s a telling side: a petulant child not getting his way. I
think that harkens back to his childhood, which was more or less robbed form
him by his mother. I would love to see a more in-depth analysis of Manson’s
behavior (delivered in an interesting way… I don’t want to read a psychiatrist’s
report).
There's an incredible amount of symbolism in this book, especially as it refers to the Beetles, but there's also a cold, real-world truth to it. Manson was out for petty revenge. Whether it was to recover money from a loan or to right the perceived wrongs of the world, Manson was as much thug as psycho.
This is the second book I’ve “read” as an audio book, and it
was a conscious decision to do so. I bought the hardcover book (more about that
below), but the more I thought about it, the more I felt this story needed to
be told to me, out loud, to get through the forensics, police procedures and
courtroom drama. And I felt it worked really well in that format. I have the
hardcover to refer back to, and I’ll probably use it for reference, even if
some of the material is dated (as far as investigative technology and
procedures go). What isn’t dated is the way the human psyche bends under the
will of charismatic persons, especially when both parties are damaged.
As an interesting note, I bought my hardcover copy second
hand, and when I cracked it open, there was an address label belonging to the
previous owner. Because it was so girly and flowery, I decided to look them up
to see what kind of person would read a book like this, and tag it with such a
pretty sticker. Eerily enough, this book belonged to a 92 year old woman who
died in a house fire, and the book came from her estate.
There’s no evidence the book is haunted at this time. But
that’s another RIG, and one I’ve done already.
Interesting that you chose to approach this in an audio book format. I can see the perks in that seeing as this is a retelling of real events with a lot of interview snippets. I don't know if that would have worked as well for me as I kept going back to refresh myself on certain things during my read. Then again, you could have referred back to your haunted copy.
ReplyDeleteManson is a good template for writing a psycho. In fact, I see many traits in him and in his childhood that have been used in several of the psychos we read about this term. At the same time, like you mentioned, he seems a hop out of character a bit during the trial. Then again, we aren't able to see how he acts outside of the high stress situation of being tried for multiple murders.
Yeah, I definitely had my trusty haunted copy to refer back to at night. I listened to it while driving, and then would go back at night and re-read areas I thought I needed better understanding of.
ReplyDeleteI'm using that book as an arm rest right now.
I think you make a great point about the Manson family and how they all seemed to have been looking for something. You mention acceptance, and I think that's exactly what they wanted/needed. Unfortunately, they appeared to find solace in the wrong place, much like the Germans who sought to get their pride back through Hitler. Manson himself appeared, to me, like he felt he was owed something, and he chose manipulation, murder, and out of the ordinary behavior to obtain the fame he wanted.
ReplyDeleteChad, you were spot-on about Manson's character, and I have to think that his little "shows" whenever he was in public were just that -- shows. I'm also very envious of your haunted book.
ReplyDelete