I’ll admit that I’m one of those guys that once they see the
movie, the book version goes to the bottom of my reading list. This book made
me rethink that policy. First off, aside from sharing a title, this book and
the motion picture starring Will Smith have little in common. Secondly, the
story-telling of Richard Matheson has consistently failed to translate to the
big screen*. Not that he’s incredibly nuanced or that his stories can’t be translated, but there hasn’t been
the right direction to capture his character-based stories.
This is especially true with a character like Robert
Neville, the self-proclaimed Legend. For much of the book (I’d call it a
novella), he is our sole window into the world. There is limited dialogue for
the first two-thirds, with the exception of some fantastic back-and-forth with
a dog (okay, the dog wasn’t a very a good conversationalist). I actually found
that once there was a two-person dialogue, the story lost some of its luster.
That’s because Matheson does such a great job with Neville’s
characterization. We know Robert Neville. We laugh with him, and we feel his
frustration. We hope to have it together as much as he does when the vampire
apocalypse comes. Because he does come off as fallible. He has his meltdowns
and his tantrums, and they are well-deserved. But he has some successes and we
are thrilled when he does.
Speaking of failures and successes, I can’t help but think
that Andy Weir was a little bit inspired by this story. First off, alone in a
strange world, Neville is forced to do what is necessary for his immediate
survival, which he does admirably. Then, he becomes a self-taught geneticist
and is able to “science the shit out of it.” He walks us through his
experiments and gives us just enough information to keep it plausible, without
boring the hell out of us. I appreciate a book that doesn’t treat me like an
idiot, but also doesn’t treat me like a scientist. Matheson maintains a good
balance. Better, in many ways, than Weir.
I want you to read this book, so I’m not going to go
blow-by-blow with the plot. What I will tell you, is that this story is
fundamentally a survival story—but not Neville’s. Imagine the world as you know
it ends, and you’re the sole remaining human. But there’s a more advance
species in man’s place. Would you fight that species? Would you hide or try to
make peace with them? If they’re truly terrifying, and you’re prejudiced
against them for something people similar to them did, would you allow yourself
the dignity of going peacefully into the night? These are questions Legend asks. At what point do you give
up, and if you don’t, can you expect the other side to? The last Neanderthals
didn’t stand up against the homo sapiens and destroy them. No, he bred with
them or died alone.
Matheson’s stories are often philosophical, and he does what
a writer should: makes the reader think long after the story is told. When does
the hero become the villain, and can we cheer his success when that success
costs innocent lives?
I spent the entire book asking myself why he’s Legend, and
finally found out on the last page. And it’s an answer worth working toward.
*The exception that
proves the rule is Stir of Echoes. Kevin
Bacon’s descent into madness is pure Matheson, and is as faithful adaption of
one of his novel’s I’ve found.
Hey Chad! Glad to see a familiar face this semester.
ReplyDeleteI guess by the sounds of it, you enjoyed "I am Legend," I know I did! One of the things I enjoyed most is the lack of dialogue. The stories I've written do have a good amount of dialogue to drive the plot forward, so it was nice to see a novel that drove the plot based on the story. I took a lot away from it, so hopefully I can implement much of what Matheson does in my story.
As you may recall from last semester, I lack the depth in Horror that most of you have. In fact, aside from last semester, I've probably only read two or three horror books. That said, I have little to no background in Vampires, other can the traditional Dracula with the black cape, pale skin and fangs, then there's The Count von Count from Sesame Street (aka the Count), and then there's Count Chocula!
In all seriousness though, knowing what I know today, based on society, I would have related the book to more Zombies than Vampires. Then I went and researched a little about the book, and I see they credit Matheson's novel, I am Legend as the kickoff to what we were to as Zombie Apocalypse. So I guess, I nailed that one!
In closing, I enjoyed it too, so now I'm off to write my own review.
Chad,
ReplyDeleteI agree with you pretty much on this one.
I too enjoyed Neville's character and the daily frustration and the little accomplishments he did have. It made him more realistic.
I'm also glad someone else mentioned the movies because much of his stuff has had a tough time being adapted (though I enjoy his Twilight Zone stuff and The Last Man on Earth).
I also feel the story was weaker with two people over just the inner workings of Neville's mind. That long in isolation would lead to some interesting conversations with oneself.
-AD
I saw the movie, I thought it was ok. I expected the book to be better, but I felt otherwise. You know what the movie did that I find refreshing? They realized how crazy it was for Robert Neville to be this blue collar guy who develops a "vaccine" for the vampires. In the movie, Will Smith played a scientist. I bought what he was doing, it made sense to me and there was so much more sentimentality and emotional pain in his character compared to Matheson's Neville.
ReplyDeleteEven the dog, I mean, Matheson spent so much time with the dog, and then, once Neville finally gets the dog, it dies. Geez, why did you bother with all that? And fine if Neville showed some kind of crushing torment from it, but not really, he just moved on. I want Will Smith's Neville, that one, to me was worthy of being a legend!
Although I wasn't fond of the story, I do agree with your thoughts on the scientific parts of it. Matheson has a nice balance with explaining enough of the information on the disease without getting so scientific it becomes dull. Presenting the information through Neville's own experimentation and discovery kept the pace going while still providing the why readers were looking for.I especially liked that the dust storms spread the disease. It was a unique approach considering usually vampirism is spread by bite or by ingesting vampire blood. It seems far more implausible that the world became overrun with vampires so quickly if everyone had to be bitten.
ReplyDeleteI also felt the story grew colder once Ruth entered. To me, it seemed that Matheson had taken Neville to a place where he had assimilated to his situation and then realized he had to pull out an interesting ending. I liked the concepts in the ending but it didn't seem to fit with the rest of the story. It went from being a personal journey to commentary on society.
I agree with you about the direction the story took once Ruth came into the picture. I didn't find their relationship believable (though I suspended belief because I've never been through a vampire apocalypse) and I think it detracted from his characterization vice improved it.
Delete