"In December 1975, the
Lutz family moved into their new home on suburban Long Island. Twenty-eight
days later, the entire Lutz family fled in terror."
So reads the back of Jay Anson’s Amityville Horror, the classic “true story” of benevolent spirits
terrorizing a young family. So terrifying and dark were the powers in that
house, even the local diocese and priests were afraid to visit the house… 112
Ocean Avenue.
This review will be a little different than past reviews,
because Amityville Horror is billed
as non-fiction. The characters in the book are true, and the DeFeo murders are
also true. There is also a house at 112 Ocean Avenue (Now 108 Ocean Avenue to
hide from looky-loos and tourists… you know, because tourists are dumb), and it
is as described in the book and on the book/movie covers: A Dutch Colonial.
The haunting that occurred to the Lutz’s after they moved
in? That has been debated, and mostly refuted by the local diocese, William
Weber (Ronald “Butch” DeFeo’s defense attorney), and convicted murderer Ronnie DeFeo himself.
Everybody knows the story of the Amityville Horror, either through the book or the original film and
the TWELVE
additional films, that include sequels and remakes. But what is the
book if not non-fiction, as claimed by so many?
It’s God-awful. If we look at the book as a work of fiction,
it is poorly written with awful character development. Jay Anson, a documentary
writer who hadn’t written a novel until Amityville,
was extremely brilliant when it came to writing the book. He acquired the book
rights before writing and publishing,
and was able to embellish slightly the haunting the Lutz’s experienced. But, he
wasn’t a very good novelist, and his book reads more like the transcript of a
campfire story, replete with unnecessary exclamation points and zero creative
prose. Without the “true story” tagline, Amityville
Horror could be the worst novel ever written. In fact, it’s opening line is
a fine contender for the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest: “George and Kathy Lutz
moved into 112 Ocean Avenue on December 18. Twenty-eight days later, they fled
in terror.”
But, before I abandon it there and
move on, let’s look at the whole package. It was sold as a true story, and the
simple writing of Jay Anson goes a long way toward selling it. If you look at
Anson’s other work, (he followed up Amityville
with the novel 666) you see he is capable of creativity, and not just fact
regurgitation. But really, that’s all Amityville
Horror is.
Is it by design? Is there genius
in the way Anson marketed the book? After all, he was a documentary writer, so
he knew the power of non-fiction. If he could harness the demonic horror that
was popular during that time (The
Exorcist – 1971, Rosemary’s Baby –
1967). Books of that ilk were also becoming big-money movies.
So here’s what I’m going to do: I’m
going to give Anson the benefit of the doubt: He set out to create a raw,
realistic story of Satanic haunting. In that regard, he succeeded. Its rawness
and lack of creativity definitely lend an air of authenticity, much as The Blair Witch Project (1999) did with
movies.
Fortunately, Amityville Horror didn’t create its own literary sub-genre like Blair Witch did with the “found footage”
style of horror we see in film.
Here’s what I did enjoy about the
book: Its simple writing, paired with its low page count, resulted in a great
read during a morning-time power outage courtesy of the Pacific Northwest
weather.
Is Amityville Horror fact, fiction, good, bad? I don’t know! If it’s
fiction, it’s bad. If it’s fact, it “is what it is.”
I actually enjoyed reading this book! I found the simple prose refreshing and I appreciated that the author remained loyal to the family's story. I also read it in the context of the era it was written. It rang true of what I remember of the true haunting from media reports. And once again, on the heels of, Ghost Story, I liked this book!!
ReplyDeleteYeah, I should have read Ghost Story first. Maybe I had a little too much animosity in me after reading it, and looking back I don't think I gave it the credit it was due... which isn't much, but more than I gave it.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteWell, I'll say there is an interesting trend going on here. So far I've read your, Chris Daniels, and Matt Andrews post, and you all disliked The Amityville Horror. As for your review, the first two posters, Stacey Rubin and I both liked it.
ReplyDeleteI don't know why I liked it, I just did. Maybe it was because I started it in the morning, and whipped through it. It was a fast read, and to the point. Outside of RIG, I tend to enjoy non-fiction, so perhaps it was the true story aspect that I enjoyed. When I finished it, I went and did research on the home. I was disappointed to read about all the controversy, and I lean towards thinking it was a complete fabrication. My understanding is that since the Lutz Family sold the home, there have been no other paranormal experiences in the home.
Chad, I agree that if the book was fiction, it was pretty bad fiction. But, if it was a factual account, then Anson did a good job, because he kept the style simple and raw, like a documentary.
ReplyDeleteWhat's kind of amazing to me is that, after all these years, there is STILL butt-ton of controversy over it. So, if it was Anson's idea to write it like it actually happened, but with a small, fictional "spin", it was a genius idea.
Gwen, great point. Perhaps he saw the story as just a good haunted house story, and decided to take it to the next level. Still, once you embellish, I think you can drop the "true story" angle and replace it with "based off true events."
Delete